Can we still trust Julian Assange and Wikileaks? Prior to last year’s election, this question would have been unthinkable. When Wikileaks dumped a massive stockpile of emails exposing corruption within not only the Democratic National Party, but the rest of the government as well, it created quite the buzz. These leaks were extremely detrimental to the reputation of U.S. politics, and as a result, many more citizens became more aware of how corrupt it really is. Whether it was the exposure of Hillary’s connections to the big banks, going as far as them writing her speeches, or the election fraud and the DNC illegally ‘taking down’ Bernie Sanders, these revelations were quite shocking to say the least.
There were multiple leaks, even one that questioned whether or not Jon Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager, was involved in an elite level political pedophile ring. This may sound completely preposterous, but the fact remains, pedophilia rings among the world’s elite are nothing new.
Does real transparency within politics even exist anymore? How can there be so much deception and misinformation? And why are some facts, even with plenty of evidence behind them, made out to seem ridiculous or “fake” by mainstream media?
Many of the leaks could not be denied, and in some cases, were even supported by those they exposed, including Clinton and Podesta, but some were so damaging that it forced a complete opposition towards Wikileaks.’ Never before have we seen such opposition toward Wikileaks in the more than a decade that they’ve been operating. Full story...
Related posts:
There were multiple leaks, even one that questioned whether or not Jon Podesta, Clinton’s campaign manager, was involved in an elite level political pedophile ring. This may sound completely preposterous, but the fact remains, pedophilia rings among the world’s elite are nothing new.
Does real transparency within politics even exist anymore? How can there be so much deception and misinformation? And why are some facts, even with plenty of evidence behind them, made out to seem ridiculous or “fake” by mainstream media?
Many of the leaks could not be denied, and in some cases, were even supported by those they exposed, including Clinton and Podesta, but some were so damaging that it forced a complete opposition towards Wikileaks.’ Never before have we seen such opposition toward Wikileaks in the more than a decade that they’ve been operating. Full story...
Related posts:
- Orwell: ‘History stopped in 1936’ (and everything since is propaganda)...
- Opinion: The fakers' little lies are eating our brains...
- CNN’s entire Russia narrative exposed as fake news for ratings...
- CNN credibility collapses under weight of fake news scandal…
- Fox News removes tweet after Trudeau complaint...
- CNN caught reporting fake news on Russian hack....
- Maduro kicks CNN out of Venezuela, accuses it of
- Fake News: The fake-stream media devours itself...
No comments:
Post a Comment